ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS (EIS)
During this reporting period, District and region Environmental branches reviewed (12) pre-draft
EIS drafts.
Of the (12) EIS’s reviewed, one of the documents identified the potential for disproportionate impacts to minority, women, elderly, disabled and low-income populations. The Eureka-Arcata Corridor project proposed to improve US 101 in the area between the cities of Eureka and Arcata in Humboldt County. The project proposed to restrict access through the highway’s median, eliminating at-grade crossings of this multi-lane highway. The project’s Community Impact Assessment indicated that the residents of a mobile home along US 101 in the area were likely to be low-income and elderly residents.
As a result, a meeting specifically tailored to these residents was held in Eureka. The meeting was publicized with letter and explanatory attachment, which was delivered to the mobile home park and distributed by the park’s management.
District and region Environmental branches held (13) public hearings and (23) public information meetings during this reporting period.
The public hearings and informational meetings were advertised through direct mailings, newspaper advertisements, and announcements at City Council meetings (televised on local access channels), radio announcements, personal telephone calls and posters in public places. Notifications of public meetings were also sent to individual residents and businesses in certain project areas.
In areas where census data indicated that non-English speaking populations were present, efforts are made to produce printed materials in the language needed for that particular community. Non-English language publications included Spanish, Vietnamese and Korean.
Interpreters were available at public hearings and informational meetings.
Minority, women, elderly, disabled and low-income community representatives were identified by working with established community-based organizations. The local planning departments were also used to identify community-based organizations, neighborhood groups, and their representatives. Holding meetings in locations that were easily accessible and where the attendees would feel comfortable encouraged participation by these groups. Meeting times were also scheduled to ensure attendance would be convenient for the target audience.
SELF-MONITORING
An ongoing employee training program keeps Division staff aware of Title VI issues in the workplace, with clear consequences identified for any violations of law or regulations.
Peer reviews of documents help monitor wording used to describe a project and its impacts to a community. These reviews ensure that the documents address the concerns of all affected populations in the project areas.
In addition to peer reviews, the documents are also reviewed by specialists in HQ to ensure that Title VI concerns have been adequately addressed. Standard operating procedures help the Division achieve uniformity when notifying the public or conducting public forums.
Peer review of documents helped the Division monitor the wording used to describe a project and assess community impact. HQ specialists performed a secondary review to ensure Title VI concerns are adequately addressed. Each level of review helped to ensure that the concerns of all affected populations in respective project areas were addressed.
TRAINING
The Division offered the following training courses that either directly or indirectly addressed issues regarding Title VI and related statutes:
-
Division of Environmental Analysis “Community Impact Assessment workshop”
-
Caltrans: Diversity in the Workplace
-
National Highway Institute: Fundamentals of EJ
-
State Office of Planning and Research: EJ workshop
The HQ Division of Environmental Analysis provided instructors to assist in presenting EJ training sponsored by the California Energy Commission. HQ Environmental personnel also took part in the preparation of an EJ training video produced by the Department of Water Resources.
In the Central Region, 129 staff members attended a Cultural Communications course.
CORRECTIVE ACTION
No Title VI complaints were received during this reporting period.