characteristics do not appeare in the verbalization of the lingua-cultural concept
68
And conceptual characteristics like Tenglik, Insoniy vazifa, Iqbol, Tole,
Ezgulik, Odob, Ahd, Sabr, Tavakkal, Totuvlik, Fazilat, Jamiyat va oilada o’z
o’rnini toppish, Moddiy va ma’naviy ehtiyojlarni qondirish have not found their
reflection in the verbalization of the lingua-cultural concept “Happiness” in English.
These conceptual characteristics show the differences of the verbalization
of the concepts “Happiness” and “Baxt” in English and Uzbek which are connected
with the cultural differences of the two nations.
69
Bibliography
1. Arthur Schopenhauer. Parerga and Paralipomena. Volume I. "Sketch of a History
of the Ideal and the Real". Oxford University Press. 1990.
2. Ben Bergen. Cognitive Linguistics. Moore 1999.
3. Bowerman, Melissa, Soonja Choi. “Space under construction: language-specific
spatial categorization in first language Acquisition”, in: Dedre Gentner & Susan
Goldin-Meadow (eds.) Language in mind. Cambridge-London: MIT Press, 2003, 387-
427 p.
4. Christopher Janaway, Self and World in Schopenhauer's Philosophy, Oxford, 2003.
Ch. 3, 112 p.
5. Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence. The Ontology of Concepts—Abstract Objects
or Mental Representations.1981.
6. Fauconnier, Gilles & Eve Sweetser, (Eds.) Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1996.
7. Fillmore, Ch. Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm (ed. by the
Linguistic Society of Korea), 111-37. Seoul: Hanshin. 1982.
8. Harrison, K. David. When Languages Die: The Extinction of the World’s
Languages and the Erosion of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2006.
9. Hempel, C. G. Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Chicago,
IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1952, 36 p.
10. H. J. Paton. Kant's Metaphysic of Experience. Allen & Unwin, 1936.
11. Janda, Laura A. “A metaphor in search of a source domain: the categories of
Slavic aspect”, Cognitive Linguistics 15, 2004, 2004b, 471-527p.
12. Janda, Laura A. Cognitive Linguistics. [revised version], Glossos 8. 2006a.
13. John Stuart Mill. A System of Logic. Book IV. Ch. II. University Press of Pacific.
2005.
14. Lakoff, George. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. 1987.
70
15. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
1999.
16. Langacker, Ronald. Assessing the Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise. In Janssen and
Redeker, 1999, 13-60 p.
17. Malt, Barbara C., Steven A. Sloman, Silvia P. Gennari. “Speaking versus thinking
about objects and actions”, in: Dedre Gentner -- Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.)
Language in mind. Cambridge-London: MIT Press,2003, 81-111 p.
18. Suzanne Kemmer. About Cognitive Linguistics historical background.1990.
19. Slobin, D. I. “Thinking for speaking”, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual
Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (1987), 435-444 p.
20. Stock, W.G. Concepts and semantic relations in information science. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1951-1969, 61(10) p.
21. Talmy, Len. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 2000.
22. Talmy, Leonard. “Fictive Motion in Language and ‘Ception’”. Language and
Space ed. by Paul Bloom et al. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. 1996.
23. Abduazizov A.A. О соотношении когнитивной семантики и стилистики.
Stilistika tilshunoslikning zamonaviy yo’nalishlarida ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya
materiallari. T-2011.
24. Batirbekova G. Концепт и когнитивная лингвистика. Horijiy tillar va
adabiyotlarni o’rganishda madaniyatlararo muloqot. Ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya
materiallari. T-2010.
25. Sh. Safarov. Kognitiv tilshunoslik. Jizzah. Sangzor nashriyoti, 2006.
26. Карасик В.И. Концепт как категория лингвокультурологии. Известия
Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. № 1(01). 2002.
27. Маслова В.А. Когнитивная лингвистика. Минск. 2004.
28. Стернин И.А., Попова З.Д. Когнитивная лингвистика. Москва. «Восток-
Запад» 2007.