| | | |
Impacts
|
close to
|
Corresponding impact from the action (Table 1)
|
Possible indicator?
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
8
|
***
|
|
**
|
*
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of biodiversity
|
|
|
Loss and damage of habitats and species [OECD, 2002]
|
18
|
|
|
**
|
**
|
|
|
ES
|
HH
|
|
M
|
|
Technological hazards
|
17
|
|
Seveso areas Z1 and Z2?
|
37
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
Greenhouse effect
|
38
|
1
|
Global warming potential: GWPglobe; 20,100 or 500 (GIEC, 2001); [Houghton & coll., 2001; Houghton & coll., 1996]
Or
Health effects due to climatic change: FIglobe; 20,100 or 500 or FI9 regions; 20,100 or 500 [Mayerhover & coll., 1997]
|
38
|
|
|
**
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
Dimming
|
37
|
1
|
|
6
|
***
|
*
|
*
|
|
*
|
R?
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Land take, landuse
|
20?
|
2
|
Surface of infrastructure? Waterproofed area surface?
|
19
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Natural protected areas
|
4
|
2? and 5?
|
|
5
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Hydraulic changes
|
|
3
|
|
17
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
HH
|
|
M
|
|
Hydraulic risk
|
18
|
3
|
|
7
|
**
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Light pollution
|
|
4
|
Traffic flow during the night?
|
31
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Visual qualities of landscape/townscape
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
***
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Habitat fragmentation for biota
|
12, 19
|
5
|
Surface of infrastructure?
|
26
|
***
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Habitat fragmentation for humans
|
|
5
|
Surface of infrastructure?
|
12
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Wild life protected areas
|
4
|
5?
|
|
1
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Acidification
|
|
6
|
Acidification potential: APglobe ; infinite [Hauschild and Wenzel, 1998; Huijbregts, 1999b] or APsensible area; infinite [Blau and Seneviratne, 1995; Hauschild and Wenzel, 1998; Hogan & coll., 1996] or APregion ; infinite [Huijbregts & coll., 2000a; Potting & coll., 1998a; b] or APDenmark, infinite [Wenzel & coll., 1997] or APHolland ; infinite [Blonk & coll., 1997b] in [Guinee & coll., 2001b]
(Huijbregts, 2000b)
|
2
|
|
*
|
*
|
**
|
*
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Direct ecotoxicity
|
3
|
6
|
|
21
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
*
|
|
|
HH
|
|
|
|
Direct restricted health effects of air pollution
|
|
6
|
Toxicity: HTPglobe; 20,100,500 or infinite [Hauschild and Wenzel, 1998; Huijbregts & coll., 2000b] or TEPglobe; infinite [Hertwich, 1999]. Factor for Europe in fact; or HTPregion; 20,100,500 or infinite [Huijbregts, 2000]
or
Carcinogenic effects on humans: FIglobe, Europe, Holland; infinite [Gedkoop and Spriemsma, 2000; Hofstetter, 1998]. Low validity of the factor for earth and Europe.
|
22
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
*
|
|
|
HH
|
|
|
|
Photochemical pollution: indirect restricted health effects
|
10
|
6
|
Formation of tropospheric ozone: POCPeurope ; 5 days or POCPNOx weak/strong ; 5 days (Anderson-Skold & coll., 1992) ; [Derwent & coll., 1998]
or
Maximal reactivity: MIRurban NOx Strong; 1 day or MOIRurban NOx Strong; 1 day or EBIRurban NOx mean ; 1 day [Carter W.P.L.]
or
Effects on human respiratory capacities due to organic compounds: FIglobe, Europe, Holland; 5 days [Gedkoop and Spriemsma, 2000; Hofstetter, 1998]. Low validity of the factor for earth and Europe.
|
9
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
E
|
Ozone depletion: ecotoxicity
|
25
|
6 and 12
|
Ozone depletion potential: ODPglobe, infinite [Wmo, 1999] or ODPglobe; 5,10,15,20, 25, 30 or 40 [Solomon and Albritton, 1992]
|
10
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
*
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Photochemical pollution: ecotoxicity
|
22
|
6 and 12
|
Formation of tropospheric ozone: POCPeurope ; 5 days or POCPNOx weak/strong ; 5 days (Anderson-Skold & coll., 1992) ; [Derwent & coll., 1998]
or
Maximal reactivity: MIRurban NOx Strong; 1 day or MOIRurban NOx Strong; 1 day or EBIRurban NOx mean ; 1 day [Carter W.P.L.]
|
3
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Eutrophication
|
2
|
6 and 7
|
Eutrophication potential: EPglobe ; infinite [Heijung & coll., 1992] or EPEurope ; infinite [Huijbregts, 1999b]; (Huijbregts, 2000b)
or
Damages to ecosystem quality due to combined effects of acidification and eutrophication: FIglobe, Europe, Holland; infinite [Gedkoop and Spriemsma, 2000; Hofstetter, 1998]. Low validity of the factor for earth and Europe.
|
33
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
Degradation of common man-made heritage
|
|
6?
|
Recognised sites and areas of importance (?) [OECD, 2002]
|
34
|
***
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
Degradation of historic man-made heritage
|
|
6?
|
35
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
Destruction of common man-made heritage
|
|
6?
|
36
|
***
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
Destruction of historic man-made heritage
|
|
6?
|
11
|
**
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Soil and water pollution: ecosystems
|
|
7
|
number of water sources affected; concentration of pollutants in the water (?) [OECD, 2002]
|
16
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
ES
|
HH
|
HWB
|
|
|
Soil and water pollution: agriculture
|
|
7
|
23
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
HH
|
|
|
|
Soil and water pollution: drinking water (water quality, uses and régime)
|
|
7
|
Presence of water harnessing field?
|
30
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Soil and water pollution: outdoor recreation
|
|
7
|
|
3
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Eutrophication
|
2
|
6 and 7
|
Eutrophication potential: EPglobe ; infinite [Heijung & coll., 1992] or EPEurope ; infinite [Huijbregts, 1999b]; (Huijbregts, 2000b)
or
Damages to ecosystem quality due to combined effects of acidification and eutrophication: FIglobe, Europe, Holland; infinite [Gedkoop and Spriemsma, 2000; Hofstetter, 1998]. Low validity of the factor for earth and Europe.
|
20
|
**
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
ES
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Noise: scarcity of quiet areas
|
6?
|
8
|
Density of road in rural areas?
|
24
|
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
HH
|
HWB
|
|
|
Noise: high spots
|
|
8
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
M
|
|
Vibration
|
|
8
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
HH
|
|
|
E
|
Ozone depletion: indirect restricted health effects
|
9
|
13?
|
Ozone depletion potential: ODPglobe, infinite [Wmo, 1999] or ODPglobe; 5,10,15,20, 25, 30 or 40 [Solomon and Albritton, 1992]
Or
Health effects due to ozone depletion: FIglobe; mid term [Gedkoop and Spriemsma, 2000; Hofstetter, 1998]
|
13
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-renewable resource use
|
|
9
|
Energy consumption, land take (?) [OECD, 2002]
|
15
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
|
**
|
|
ES
|
HH
|
HWB
|
|
|
Waste
|
|
10
|
Waste intensity index (?); waste accumulation rate (?)
|
27
|
|
|
**
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Odour (sensitive pollution)
|
|
11
|
Odor potential: OPglobe ; infinite [Heijung & coll., 1992]; (Guinee & coll., 2002)
|
28
|
|
|
*
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Soiling (sensitive pollution)
|
|
11
|
|
29
|
|
|
*
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
HWB
|
|
|
Visibility (sensitive pollution)
|
|
11
|
Scale and key physical characteristics (?) [OECD, 2002]
|
9
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
E
|
Ozone depletion: ecotoxicity
|
25
|
6 and 12
|
Ozone depletion potential: ODPglobe, infinite [Wmo, 1999] or ODPglobe; 5,10,15,20, 25, 30 or 40 [Solomon and Albritton, 1992]
|
10
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
*
|
|
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Photochemical pollution: ecotoxicity
|
22
|
6 and 12
|
Formation of tropospheric ozone: POCPeurope ; 5 days or POCPNOx weak/strong ; 5 days (Anderson-Skold & coll., 1992) ; [Derwent & coll., 1998]
or
Maximal reactivity: MIRurban NOx Strong; 1 day or MOIRurban NOx Strong; 1 day or EBIRurban NOx mean ; 1 day [Carter W.P.L.]
|
25
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
HH
|
|
|
E
|
Ozone depletion: indirect restricted health effects
|
9
|
8? and 13?
|
Ozone depletion potential: ODPglobe, infinite [Wmo, 1999] or ODPglobe; 5,10,15,20, 25, 30 or 40 [Solomon and Albritton, 1992]
Or
Health effects due to ozone depletion: FIglobe; mid term [Gedkoop and Spriemsma, 2000; Hofstetter, 1998]
|
14
|
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
ES
|
HH
|
|
|
|
Traffic safety
|
|
14
|
Number of accidents, number of dead peoples, number of serious casualties, number of light casualties?
|
