Oxford history of the christian church

Footnotes.

^1	In general for the Fourth Crusade and subsequent Latin Empire and principalities see Longnon; R. L. Wolff and H. W. Hazard (eds.), History of the Crusades, II (Madison and London, 1969); Runciman, Crusades, III; Setton, Papacy and the Levant, I (rich bibliography); Gill, Byzantium and the Papacy; Norden, Papsttum; Angold; Nicol, Epiros, I.
^2	For details on this (not the primary concern here) see Fedalto, Chiesa latina, I (2nd edn. essential) and II.
^3	PL215, col. 623, bk. 8, Ep. 55 (15 May 1205).
^4	See R. L. Wolff, “Politics in the Latin Patriarchate,” 225-303 for details on the patriarchate (with previously unpublished texts).
^5	PL215, col. 516, bk. 7, Ep. 203.
^6	On the fate of the Greek monasteries in Constantinople see R. Janin, “Les Sanctuaires de Byzance sous la domination latine (1204-1261),” EB, 2 (1944), 134-84.
^7	See Wolff, “Politics in the Latin Patriarchate,” 262 ff, and texts in the Appendix.
^8	GR1202, where his death is put in May 1206; cf. Gill, Byzantium and the Papacy, 34, who gives 20 June 1206.
^10	See A. Heisenberg, “Neue Quellen zur Geschichte des lateinischen Kaisertums und der Kirchenunion,” Sitzungsb. der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Philos.-philolog. und hist. Klasse (Munich, 1922-3), I-III.
^9	On Nicholas's role in Byzantino-Latin relations see J. M. Hoeck and R.-J. Loenertz, Nikolavs — Nektarios von Otranto Abt vonCasole (Ettal, 1965).
^11	Its Photian origin has been questioned; see M. Gordillo, OCP, 6 (1940), 5-39.
^12	See R. L. Wolff, “The Organisation of the Latin Patriarchate of Constantinople, 1204-1261,” Traditio, 6 (1948), pp. 48 ff., where the Latin Provinciale (c.1210 and 1228) is compared with the relevant Greek Notitiae Episcopatuum.
^13	PL215, col. 1433, bk. XI, Ep. 113. For details on the Athenian Church (1204-1308) see Setton, Papacy and the Levant, I. 405 ff. and J. Longnon, “L'Organisation de l'église d'Athènes par Innocent III,” Mémorial Louis Petit (Bucarest, 1948) 336-40.
^14	H. Ahrweiler, “La Région de Smyrne,” TM, 1 (1965), 56-7.
^15	Confirmed by Innocent III; see PL215, col. 967, bk. IX, Ep. 142 (5 Aug. 1206). See Wolff, 'Politics in the Latin Patriarchate', pp. 258 ff., on the haggling over the implementation of the agreement.
^16	Confirmed by Honorius III in 1219 and 1223 who cites the text of Innocent III's confirmation, PL 216, cols. 414-16; and C. A. Horoy (ed.), Honorii III . . . Opera (Paris, 1880), vol. 4, no. 10, cols. 409-16.
^17	See J. Koder, Tabula Imperii Byzantini, I, Negroponte . . . (Vienna, 1973), 134 ff.
^18	On the administrative changes in Greek and Roman churches in central Greece under Latin rule see J. Koder, Tabula Imperii Byzantini, I, Hellas und Thessalia . . . (Vienna, 1976), 83-9.
^19	See the brief survey by F. E. Thiriet, La Symbiose dans les états latins formés sur les territoires de la Romania byzantine (1202 à 1261): Phénomènes religieux', Rapports, XVth International Congress of Byzantine Studies (Athens, 1976).
^20	Cited by A. Bon, La Morée franque (Paris, 1969), 90.
^21	Chronicle of the Morea (Greek version), ed. J. Schmitt (London, 1904), II. 2093-4 (also ed. P. Kalonaros, Athens, 1940).
^22	Raynaldus, Annales Ecclesiastici, 24, anno 1322 (1 Oct.), cited by D. Jacoby, “The Encounter of Two Societies: Western Conquerors and Byzantines in the Peloponnesus after the Fourth Crusade,” AHR, 78 (1973), 898.
^23	See the professiones fidei cited in MM 2, e.g. pp. 8-9, 48, 84, 343, and passim.
^24	G. Dimitrokallis, Συμβολαί ἐἰζ τὴν μἐλέτήν τω+̑ν βυĆαντινω+̂ν νήμἐίών τη+̑çNάου (Athens, 1972), 187; see also id., “The Byzantine Churches of Naxos,” Am. Journ. Arch., 72 (1968), 283-6.
^25	On Venetian attitudes see F. Thiriet, Romanie vénitienne.
^26	The Orthodox see of the Venetian Coron in the Peloponnese was a curious exception due to unusual circumstances; the Greek bishop here was required to live seven kilometers outside the city; see Thiriet, Romanie vénitienne, 289 and 404.
^27	See J. Gill, Pope Urban V (1362-1370) and the Greeks of Crete', OCP, 39 (1973), 463.
^28	Acta Ioannis XXII, A. L. Tɑ+̆utu (Vatican, 1952) No. 81 (1 Apr. 1326), cited by J. Gill, Pope Urban V (1362-1370) and the Greeks of Crete', OCP, 39 (1973), 464-5.
^29	F. Thiriet, Délibérations des Assemblées vénitiennes concernant la Romanie, vol. I (Paris, 1966), nos. 668-9, pp. 247-8.
^30	See J. Gill, op. cit. 460-8.
^31	Acta Urbani V, ed. A. L. Tɑ+̆utu (Rome, 1964), no. 153 (28 July 1368).
^32	See F. Thiriet, Le Zèle unioniste d'un Franciscain crétois et la riposte de Venise (1414), Polychronion, ed. P. Wirth (Heidelberg, 1966), 496-504.
^33	See F. Thiriet, “La Situation religieuse en Crète au début du XVe siècle,” B, 36 (1966), 201-12, and N. Tomadakis, “La politica religiosa di Venezia a Creta verso i Cretesi ortodossi dal XIII al XV secolo,” in Venezia e il Levante, ed. A. Pertusi (Florence, 1973), I(ii), 783-800.
^34	For details on the Cypriot Church see J. Hackett, A History of the Orthodox Church of Cyprus (London, 1901, an amended Greek translation by C. A. Papaïoannou, 3 vols., Athens and Piraeus, 1923-32) and G. Hill, A history of Cyprus (Cambridge, 1948), III.
^35	See the entries in J. L. La Monte, “A Register of the Cartulary of the Cathedral of Santa Sophia of Nicosia,” B, 5 (1929-30), 439-522; no.20 (8 Mar. 1222), states that 'the Latin clergy are to hold of right all properties which were previously held by Greek clergy . . .'.
^36	J. Hackett, op. cit. 470, gives a map of the Latin dioceses showing the four Orthodox episcopal sees.
^37	GR 1250.
^38	Conveniently summarized by J. L. La Monte, op. cit., passim; references cited are to La Monte's numbering.
^39	La Monte, op. cit., no. 96 (1264).
^40	Ibid., no. 93 (1263) .
^41	Ibid., no. 131 (1472) .
^42	Cited by G. Hill, History of Cyprus, III. 1090.
^43	La Monte, no. 127 (1368).
^44	C. Enlart, L' Art gothique et la renaissance en Chypre (Paris, 1899), II. 440-1.
^45	A. and J. Stylianou, The Painted Churches of Cyprus (Cyprus, 1964), 109; see passim for other instances of the mingling of Greek and Latin usages and rites. See also id., 'Donors and dedicatory inscriptions, supplicants and supplications in the painted churches of Cyprus', JΟ+̈B, 9 (1960), 97-128.
^46	Cited by C. D. Cobham, Excerpta Cypria (Cambridge, 1908), pp. 40-1 and passim.
^47	On such later relations between Roman Catholics and Orthodox see K. T. Ware, “Orthodox and Catholics in the Seventeenth Century: Schism or intercommunion,” in D. Baker (ed.), Studies in Church History, 9 (Cambridge, 1972), 259-76.
^48	See P. Wirth, 'Zur Frage eines politischen Engagements Patriarch Johannes' X. Kamateros nach dem vierten Kreuzzug', Byzantinische Forschungen, 4 (1972), 239-52.
^49	DR2 1676a and 1676b (autumn 1207/before 2 Mar 1208).
^50	See V. Laurent, 'La Chronologie des patriarches de Constantinople au XIIIe s. (1208-1309)', REB, 27 (1969), 129-33.
^51	DR2, vol. 3, p. 1.
^52	GR 1205, 1206, and 1207.
^53	For details of this contest see Nicol, Epiros I and A. D. Karpozilos, The Ecclesiastical Controversy between the Kingdom of Nicaea and the Principality of Epíros (1217-33) (Thessalonica, 1973).
^54	GR 1225.
^55	GR 1230.
^56	DR2 1704; see below p. 213.
^57	GR 1239.
^58	GR 1244.
^59	GR 1244 and 1248.
^60	GR 1282 and 1285.
^61	GR 1263 and 1265.
^62	See above ch. VII, section 1.
^63	GR1219.
^64	Ed. A. Heisenberg, Neue Quellen, III.
^65	GR1256 and 1257.
^66	A. L. Ta+̆utu (ed.), Greg. IX, no. 179 (26 July 1232).
^67	See Golubovich, Biblioteca, II. 362-7; Ta+̆utu, Greg. IX, no. 193 (18 May 1233).
^68	R. L. Wolff, “The Latin Empire of Constantinople and the Franciscans,” Traditio, 2 (1944), 213-37, discusses their role within the Latin Empire as well as their services in negotiating union.
^69	R. Loenertz, “Les Établissements dominicains de Péra-Constantinople,” EO, 34 (1935), 332-49 (reprinted in his collected essays Byzantina et Franco-Graeca, I, Rome, 1970).
^70	Disputatio Latinorum et Graecorum. . ., ed. G. Golubovich, Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, 12 (1919), 428-70.
^71	N. Blemmydes, Curriculum Vitae, ed. A. Heisenberg (Leipzig, 1896) and J. A. Munitiz (Louvrain, 1984); P. Canart, Nicéphore Blemmyde et le mémoire adressé aux envoyés de Grégoire IX (Nicée, 1234)', OCP, 25 (1959), 310-25.
^72	Disputatio, op. cit., ch. 7, p. 434.
^73	Disputatio, op. cit., ch. 14, p. 445; Mansi, 23. 292.
^74	The friars were in fact invited to Leschera which would appear to have been near Nymphaeum where the discussions with the Emperor and clergy took place. See GR 1269-76 for correspondence and the debates on the filioque and azymes.
^75	See above pp. 203 ff.
^76	Nicholas of Curbio, ed. L. Muratori, Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, III, I (Milan, 1723), p. 592 k.
^77	DR21795; the Byzantine Patriarch Manuel II wrote direct to John of Parma about this (GR1311); on the embassy of John of Parma see Franchi, La svolta.
^78	DR21804 and GR1313.
^79	G. Hofmann, Patriarch von Nikaia Manuel II. an Papst Innozenz IV., OCP, 19 (1953), 59-70; he gives the text and dates the letter to 1250; he is followed by Gill, Byzantium and the Papacy, 90-1, 95; V. Laurent prefers the 1253 embassy (GR1319).
^80	DR21816 a; the terms on either side are known from the letters of Innocent IV's successor Alexander IV to Theodore II Lascaris and to the papal legate Constantine, bishop of Orvieto.
^81	GR, fasc. IV, p. 111.
^82	See F. Schillmann, “Zur byzantinischen Politik Alexanders IV.,” Röm. Quart., 22 (1908), 108-31.
^83	GR1332.