Mbn hiv/aids evaluation final report Team of consultants

Judgment criteria HPR	(1.1) The CFA internalised HIV/AIDS in all its core functions (1.2.) The CFAs take HIV/AIDS into account in the elaboration of programmes, the assessment of funding proposals and the identification of partners. (1.3) The CFAs have put HIV/AIDS on the development agenda	(2.1) The issue of HIV/AIDS is incorporated in the dialogue between CFA and counterpart. (2.2) Improved HIV/AIDS competence of counterparts to deal with staff susceptibility and organisational vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. (2.3) Improved competence of counterparts to adapt new and existing programmes to the context of HIV/AIDS and contribute positively to the wider response to HIV/AIDS	(3.1) The counterpart offers a comprehensive package of HIV/AIDS services geared to the needs of the defined target groups (focus on the CFA strategy on direct poverty alleviation) (3.2) An AIDS-competent society has emerged (focus on the CFA strategy on civil society building) (3.3) Counterparts have put HIV/AIDS on the policy agenda of local, regional or national governments (focus on the CFA strategy on advocacy and lobbying)
(4.1) Counterparts meet the needs of the target groups, including PLWHA and households affected by HIV/AIDS and taking into account gender differences. (4.2) Counterparts have modified programmes/activities to ensure full participation of PLWHA and/or households-communities affected by HIV/AIDS, also taking into account gender differences. (4.3) Adequate awareness raising activities and prevention have been integrated in the overall programme.