Mbn hiv/aids evaluation final report Team of consultants

Judgment criteria LPR	Not relevant	Same judgment criteria as in HPR, modification of the indicators.	Same judgment criteria and indicators as for HPR
(4.4) Adequate awareness raising activities and prevention matters have been integrated in the overall programme

The table below gives an overview of the correspondence of the evaluation question to the demands requested in the Terms of reference and of the most important methods for data collection.
Table 2: Overview of evaluation questions and methods for data collection

CFA’s inputs	Process: interface between CFAs and partners	Output: counterpart output and outcomes at target group
The HIV/AIDS responsiveness of CFAs’ policies and practices Strategic funding to HIV/AIDS Lobbying and advocacy Collaboration between CFAs and other donors	Linking and learning, knowledge transfer, sharing of experiences, dialogue and workshops	Results of programmes by counterparts Evidence of outcome at target group level
Evaluation question (EQ) 1 Gender	EQ 2 Gender	EQ 3 EQ 4 Gender
Analysis of documents Financial analysis Interviews/ discussion sessions with CFAs Study of SAN! documents and interview with director of SAN!	Interviews with CFAs Interviews/ discussion sessions with counterparts	Interviews and self assessment exercises with counterparts Interviews/ focus group discussions with volunteers Interviews/ focus group discussions with beneficiaries Interviews with other stakeholders