59
his action was taken in a mala fide manner with the purpose of preventing the
Pakistan People's Party from participating in the forthcoming elections.
242
The court admitted the petition and ordered immediate
shifting of the detainees
from Lahore to Rawalpindi. The admission of the petition might have been seen by
General Zia as a potential threat, therefore he amended the Constitution of 1973.
243
Even prior to the proceedings and the decision in the
Nusrat Bhutto case, the
Supreme Court of Pakistan had not only accorded legitimacy to the martial law
regime but had also acknowledged and recognized the inherent authority of that
regime to amend the Constitution.
244
Khan was
right to observe that the
reconstituted Supreme Court by virtue of the amendment had ab initio accepted
the lawful authority of the regime and recognized it as the new legislature.
245
The petition was eventually heard by a nine-judge bench headed by Chief Justice
Sheikh Anwar-ul-Haq. The court dismissed the petition. The Supreme Court
unanimously held that there was a serious political crisis in the country leading to
a breakdown of the constitutional machinery for which the Constitution provided
no solution. Not that he was bound to under the principle of stare decisis, but the
Chief Justice applied the doctrine of necessity and deviated from the immediate
Dostları ilə paylaş: