Cordon, S. L., Finney, & Sara J. (2008). Measurement invariance of the mindful attention awareness scale across adult attachment style. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 40(4), 228-245.
Davis, T.J., Morris, M. & Drake, M. M. (2016). The moderation effect of mindfulness on the relationship between adult attachment and wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 115-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.080
Feliu-Soler, A., Soler, J., Luciano, J. V., Cebolla, A., Elices, M., Demarzo, M., & Garc韆-Campayo, J. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Nonattachment Scale (NAS) and its relationship with mindfulness, decentering, and mental health. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1156-1169. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0558-0
Feng, X. J., Kr鋑eloh, Ch. U., Medvedev, O. N., Billington, D. R., Jang, J. Y., & Siegert, R. J. (2016). Assessing mechanisms of mindfulness: Improving the precision of the nonattachment scale using a rasch model. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1082-1091. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0546-4
Gambrel, L. E., Faas, C., Kaestle, C. E., & Savla, J. (2016). Interpersonal Neurobiology and Couple Relationship Quality: A Longitudinal Model. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(3), 272-283. DOI: 10.1007/s10591-016-9381-y
Goodall, K., Trejnowska, A. & Darling, S. (2012). The relationship between dispositional mindfulness, attachment security and emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 622-626. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.008
Hertz, R. M., Laurent, H. K. & Laurent, S. M. (2015). Attachment mediates effects of trait mindfulness on stress responses to conflict. Mindfulness, 6(3), 483-489.
Johnson, D.C. & Johnson, L.B. (2010). Reinventing the stress concept. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(3), 218-231. DOI: 10.1891/1559-4343.12.3.218
Lamis, D. A. & Dvorak, R. D. (2014). Mindfulness, nonattachment, and suicide rumination in college students: The mediating role of depressive symptoms. Mindfulness, 5(5), 487-496. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-013-0203-0
Leigh, J., & Anderson, V.N. (2013). Secure attachment and autonomy orientation may foster mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 14 (2), 265-283. DOI: 10.1080/14639947.2013.832082
Luk, J., Holman, G., & Kohlenberg, R. (2008). Contextual variations of mindfulness across interpersonal and task-oriented contexts: The roles of gender and ethnicity. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 13(4), 184-190.
Macaulay, C. B., Watt, M. C., MacLean, K., & Weaver, A. (2015). Mindfulness mediates associations between attachment and anxiety sensitivity. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1263-1270.
Maslyn, J. M., Schyns, B. & Farmer, S. M. (2017). Attachment style and leader-member exchange: The role of effort to build high quality relationships [Abstrakt]. Leadership and organization development journal., 38(3), 450-462. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-01-2016-0023
McDonald, H. M., Sherman, K. A., Petocz, P., Kangas, M., Grant, K. A. & Kasparian, N. A. (2016). Mindfulness and the experience of psychological distress: The mediating effects of emotion regulation and attachment anxiety. Mindfulness, 7(4), 799-808. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0517-9
Melen, S., Pepping, C. A. & O扗onovan, A. (2017). Social foundations of mindfulness: Priming attachment anxiety reduces emotion regulation and mindful attention. Mindfulness, 8(1), 136-143. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0587-8
Mikl髎i, M., Szab M. & Simon, L. (2017). The role of mindfulness in the relationship between perceived parenting, early maladaptive schemata and parental sense of competence. Mindfulness, 8, 471-480. DOI: DOI 10.1007/s12671-016-0619-4
Montero-Marin, J., Puebla-Guedea, M., Herrera-Mercadal, P.; Cebolla, A.. Soler, J., Demarzo, M., Vazquez, C., Rodr韌uez-Bornaetxea, F., & Garc韆-Campayo, J. (2016). Psychological effects of a 1-month meditation retreat on experienced meditators: The role of non-attachment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-10. 10p. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01935.
Music, G. (2014). The buzz trap: Speeded-up lives, distractedness, impulsiveness and decreasing empath. Psychodynamic Practice, 20(3), 228-249. DOI: 10.1080/14753634.2014.916840.
Pepping, C. A., Davis, P.J., & O'Donovan, A. (2013). Individual differences in attachment and dispositional mindfulness: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 453-456. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.006
Pepping, C. A., Davis, P.J., & O'Donovan, A. (2015). The association between state attachment security and state mindfulness. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0116779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116779
Pepping, C. A. & Duvenage, M. (2016). The origins of individual differences in dispositional mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 130-136 DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.027
Pepping, C. A., O'Donovan, A. & Davis, P. J (2014). The differential relationship between mindfulness and attachment in experienced and inexperienced meditators. Mindfulness, 5(4), 392-399. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-012-0193-3
Pickard, J.A., Caputi, P. & Grenyer, B.F.S. (2016). Mindfulness and emotional regulation as sequential mediators in the relationship between attachment security and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 179-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.091
Rowe, A. C., Shepstone, L., Carnelley, K. B., Cavanagh, K. & Millings, A. (2016). Attachment security and self-compassion priming increase the likelihood that first-time engagers in mindfulness meditation will continue with mindfulness training. Mindfulness, 7(3), 642-650.
Saavedra, M.C., Rogge, R.D. & Chapman, K.E. (2010). Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: Hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 380-390. DOI: 10.1037/a0019872
Sahdra, B. K., Ciarrochi, J. & Parker, P. (2016). Nonattachment and mindfulness: Related but distinct constructs. Psychological Assessment, 28(7), 819-829. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000264
Sahdra, B. K., MacLean, K. A., Ferrer, E., Shaver, P. R., Rosenberg, E. L., Jacobs, T. L., Zanesco, A. P., King, B. G., Aichele, S. R., Bridwell, D. A., Mangun, G. R., Lavy, S., Wallace, B. A., & Saron, C. D. (2011). Enhanced response inhibition during intensive meditation training predicts improvements in self-reported adaptive socioemotional functioning. Emotion, 11(2), 299-312. DOI: 10.1037/a0022764
Shaver, P. R., Lavy, S., Saron, C. D. & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Social foundations of the capacity for mindfulness: An attachment perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 264-271. DOI: 10.1080/10478400701598389
Snyder, R., Shapiro, S. & Treleaven, D. (2012). Attachment theory and mindfulness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(5), 709-217. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-011-9522-8
Swart, J. (2014). Applying Buddhist principles to mode deactivation theory and practice. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation & Therapy, 9(2), 26-30.
Walsh, J. J., Balint, M. G., Smolira, S. J. D. R., Fredericksen, L. K., & Madsen, S. (2009). Predicting individual differences in mindfulness: The role of trait anxiety, attachment anxiety and attentional control. In Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 94-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.008
Ploha 4 – P鴈hled dotazn韐pro m禅enmindfulness
P鴈vztato z p鴈dchozvlastnpr醕e (Bla瀍jovsk 2013, s. 112, ploha 5):
刄praveno a 栳ste鑞citov醤o dle Bendy (2007, s. 136). Benda s醡 tabulku p鴈vzal od Cardaciotto (2005).
Dotazn韐StrukturaZam龤lenvyu瀒tíOmezenMAAS
- 妅醠a v氻mavpozornosti a uv靌omov醤í20 1 faktor, 1 sk髍e
15 polo瀍k, Likertova 歬醠a o 6 bodech
- vy殮sk髍e = vy殮m韗a v氻mavosti.M禅celkovou tendenci k tomu b齮 pozorn(attentive) a v靌om(aware) v ptomn閙 okam瀒ku b靐em ka瀌odenn韍o 瀒vota.Nezahrnuje postojovkomponenty, jako nap p鴌jetFIM
- Freiburskinvent狲 v氻mavosti4 faktory21
1 souhrnnsk髍e
30 polo瀍k
Likertova 歬醠a o 4 bodechM禅neposuzuj韈zaznamen醰醤ptomnosti a otev鴈nosti k negativnzku歟nosti.
Ur鑕n pro zku歟nmedituj韈Je navr瀍na pouze pro pou瀒tu zku歟n齝h medituj韈韈h.
Pro nemedituj韈slou烅 jejkrat氻 verze22 KIMS
- Kentuckinvent狲 schopnostv氻mavosti4 faktory23
1 souhrnnsk髍e
39 polo瀍k
Likertova 歬醠a o 5 bodechZobrazuje celkovou tendenci k v氻mavosti v ka瀌odenn韒 瀒voti u osob bez medita鑞zku歟nosti.Nejv韈e odpov韉v氻mavosti, jak je poj韒醤a v r醡ci dialektickterapie chov醤CAMS24
- Kognitivna afektivn歬醠a v氻mavosti4 aspekty v氻mavosti
1 souhrnnsk髍e
12 polo瀍k
Likertova 歬醠a o 4 bodechM禅uv靌omov醤si, pozornost, soust鴈d靚na ptomnost a neposuzov醤p鴌jetHodnotpouze zachycenmy歭enek a pocit dal氻 fenom閚y nem禅MQ
4 aspekty v氻mavosti
1 faktor a souhrnnsk髍e
16 polo瀍k, Likertova 歬醠a o 7 bodechM禅4 aspekty:
v氻mavpozorov醤 pou歵靚(espond go), neaverzi a nehodnocen Ur鑕na pro medituj韈i nemedituj韈Obsahuje 4 aspekty, av歛k jejstruktura je omezena na 1 faktor.Ploha 5 – Struktura dotazn韐p靦i aspektv氻mavosti (FFMQ)
P鴈vztato z p鴈dchozvlastnpr醕e (Bla瀍jovsk 2013, s. 46):
凢FMQ obsahuje 39 polo瀍k a charakterizuje v氻mavost jako koncept s 5 slo瀔ami. Ka瀌aspekt je m禅en na vlastnsub歬醠e – v齭ledkem dotazn韐u je celkovsk髍e v氻mavosti a p靦 sk髍z n醩leduj韈韈h sub歬醠 (巌tn韐, 2010):
妅醠a pozorov醤– t齥se bd靗pozornosti k tomu, co se pr醰odehr醰 vn靔氻m podn靦鵰 (zvuky, barvy, v鵱臁K) i vnit鴑韒 pro瀒tk鵰 (my歭enky, emoce, p鴈dstavy, t靗esnpocity). 刅y殮sk髍e ukazuje na vn韒avost 鑙 otev鴈nost vi sv靦u a ochotu v靚ovat pozornost sv齧 pocit鵰.(巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108).
妅醠a popisov醤– p鴈dstavuje schopnost vyj醖鴌t svpocity, my歭enky nebo p鴈dstavy ve formslov. Vy殮sk髍e ukazuje na lep氻 n醜led na svpocity a orientaci v nich. Ni灇sk髍e ukazuje na pot頌e s ur鑕n韒 a pops醤韒 sv齝h pocitanebo n韟kz醞em o svvnit鴑pro烅v醤
妅醠a v靌om閔o jedn醤– hodnotschopnost b齮 plnpozornk 鑙nnosti, kterou 鑜ov靕 moment醠nd靗– opakem je automatickchov醤 kdy je 鑜ov靕 刣uchem neptomn龘 a myslna jinstarosti, vzpom韓ky atd. M鶠e p鴌 tom v閟t tzv. vnit鴑monolog. 凩ids n韟k齧 sk髍e jsou 鑑sto anga瀘vanv automatick閙 aneurotick閙 jedn醤a bezmy歭enkovitse chovajtak, aby sn頌ili svou 鷝kost.(巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108).
妅醠a nehodnocenintrapsychick齝h pro瀒tk– p鴈dstavuje zaujetnehodnot韈韍o postoje k vlastn韒 my歭enk醡 a pocit鵰. Vy殮sk髍e v t閠o sub歬醠e ukazuje 剆chopnost aktivn韍o p鴌jetintrapsychick齝h pro瀒tk鶕 (巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108), 鑜ov靕 tak dok釣e p鴌j韒at vlastnpro瀒tky a p鴌tom je nehodnotit jako dobr鑙 歱atn pjemn鑙 nepjemn vhodn鑙 nevhodn Sub歬醠a negativnkoreluje se zv龤enou snahou vyhnout se 鑙 potla鑙t svmy歭enky 鑙 emoce.
妅醠a nereagov醤na vyno鴘j韈se pro瀒tky – reprezentuje 剆chopnost nenechat se un閟t 鑙 se zapl閟t do my歭enek a emoc頁 (巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108). Znamento vn韒at svvnit鴑pro瀒tky, emoce, my歭enky, p鴈dstavy s odstupem a nenechat se vt醜nout do sv齝h automatick齝h zp鵶obreagov醤na takov閠o pro瀒tky.“